Daily Record
By David Ball
April 17, 2008
http://www.jaxdailyrecord.com/showstory.php?Story_id=49854#
By the end of
today, many more people outside of
The national
environmental group American Rivers this morning made public its annual list of
“
The St. Johns Riverkeeper, the area’s most vocal critics of the plan,
held a press conference this morning in
“American Rivers is
one of the pre-eminent if not the pre-eminent river group in this country,”
said Armingeon. “This is one of the biggest national
environmental stories every year, and it will run in every major newspaper and
draw national attention to what is going on.”
American Rivers officials claim
the designation and accompanying reports are based on scientific research.
However, Water Management District Executive Director Kirby Green said there’s
nothing scientific or objective about it and that it moves an important
discussion out of the rational and into the emotional.
“At best, I would
characterize their list as a position paper,” said Green. “I think a lot of
this is to help them build their memberships. It’s sensationalism, and it
doesn’t reflect where the river truly is.”
The
However, Green said
American Rivers never contacted the District to find out any specific plans.
“The Web site says
it’s a scientifically based, balanced organization that’s dedicated to giving a
balanced approach to the health of rivers,” said Green. “How do you do that
when you don’t contact people along the river that are involved with these
issues every day?”
Matt Rice, associate
director of Southeast conservation for American Rivers, said the endangered
rivers were chosen among hundreds of applications from local environmental
groups outlining the threats to their rivers.
“St. Johns Riverkeeper turned in their nomination packet, and they
included a lot of information that helped us make our decision,” said Rice.
“Since then, our Most Endangered Rivers team has spent a lot of time fact
checking and making sure the research and facts are straight.”
Rice said one of
the criteria for a river to make the list is that there has to be an impending
decision within a year that could affect the threat posed to the river. For the
“
The
Armingeon said the designation’s main
goal is to raise a national awareness of the Water Management Districts “failed
plan,” particularly a lack of knowledge about how withdrawing water near the
headwaters could affect the nutrient and pollution content further downstream.
“We hope to combine
our local activism and
Green said the
District is a few months into a two-year study that will see take a second look
at 10 years of initial research showing that water can be safely withdrawn from
the river. It will be complete before any future projects are up for permit, he
said.
“We will continue
to do studies to ensure the health of the river is being protected,” said
Green. “We will continue to exercise what we think are our statutory directives
to protect the river, protect the ecosystem around the river and make sure the
citizens of the state have water when they need it.”