Business Wire
PRESS RELEASE
Fitch Downgrades South Florida
Water Management District COPs to 'AA-'; Outlook
Stable
--$500.2 million certificates of participation (COPs) downgraded to 'AA-' from 'AA';
--$25.1 million special obligation land acquisition
refunding bonds affirmed at 'A'.
In addition, Fitch assigns the following rating:
--Implied general obligation (GO) bond rated 'AA'.
The Rating Outlook is Stable.
SECURITY
The COPs evidence undivided
proportionate interests in lease payments made by the district to the district
from legally available funds budgeted and appropriated for such purpose. In the
event of non-appropriation, the district must surrender all facilities lease
purchased under the master lease agreement to the trustee who may re-let or
sell the facilities for the benefit of certificate owners.
The district's special obligation bonds are secured by a
first lien on pledged revenues, which include all payments received by the district
from a water management lands fund trust (the trust fund) and the generated
interest. The payments consist of a designated portion of revenues derived from
excise taxes on documents (the documentary stamp tax) imposed by the state on
certain document filings including mortgages, original issues of stock, bonds
and debentures, promissory notes or other written obligations to pay money.
KEY
RATING DRIVERS
REDUCED FINANCIAL AUTONOMY: The downgrade of the COPs reflects the district's inability to implement revenue
raising measures as a result of the state's newly implemented limitation on ad valorem collections. Substantial declines in this revenue
source have necessitated steep expenditure reductions and the planned use of
reserves to achieve budgetary balance in fiscal 2012 and 2013.
PLANNED DIMINISHMENT OF RESERVES: The district has begun
to implement a five-year draw-down of reserves, primarily to fund one-time
capital expenditures, minimizing a once considerable short-term financial
cushion. Pay-as-you-go capital financing, a mark of financial flexibility, will
ebb in future years.
STRONG AND DIVERSE SERVICE AREA: The service area,
encompassing 16 south and central
DEBT POSITION CREDIT POSITIVE: Debt levels are moderately
low, supported by a vast tax base. No future debt is currently planned.
COMPLEX INTERLOCAL EFFORT:
COPs SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION: The
COPS are payable from lease payments subject to annual appropriation by the
district. Fitch believes the highly essential nature of the lease purchased
assets for the restoration of the
DOCUMENTARY STAMP TAX BONDS - ADEQUATE COVERAGE OF
VOLATILE REVENUES: The rating incorporates the legislature's history of
altering the tax rate and distribution formula of a pledged revenue stream that
is already narrow and economically sensitive. Coverage remains adequate,
statutory restrictions prohibit the issuance of additional bonds, and the
current issue reaches final maturity in 2015.
CREDIT
PROFILE
COMPLEX MANDATE
The district is the largest of five regional water
districts created by the state in 1972 to provide regional flood control, water
supply and water quality protection, ecosystem restoration, and to operate and
maintain
The district is the local sponsor of the Comprehensive
Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP), a series of projects designed to protect
and enhance the
NARROWING
REVENUE RAISING CAPACITY
The downgrade of the district's COPs
reflects the district's loss of significant revenue raising capacity due to
recently enacted legislation that authorizes the state legislature to determine
annually the district's ad valorem revenues. Fitch
also notes that state law subjects the district's annual budget to approval, in
whole or in part, by the governor of the state. Though not legally pledged, ad valorem collections
are the primary source for lease payments and, at a combined $270.7 million in
fiscal 2012, represent an extremely concentrated 94% of revenues available for
debt service. The 32% legislatively imposed ad valorem
revenue decline in the fiscal 2012 budget follows several years of revenue
weakening attributable to deterioration in the housing market, resulting in a
sharp 50.8% drop in collections from audited fiscal 2007. Revenues currently
remain considerable relative to $35.5 million maximum annual debt service
(MADS) on the 2006 COPs.
In response to the revenue reductions, the district
reduced fiscal 2012 budgeted operational expenditures by about $104.5 million
by streamlining non-mandated activities, most notably through the elimination
of around 286 positions (about 16% of staff), as well as by benefit and
programmatic cut-backs. The district stated it has the room to reduce other
expenditures, including recreational programs, additional administrative costs,
and some monitoring and scientific studies. Fitch will monitor the district's
ability to adjust spending without reducing core functions in coming years.
POTENTIAL
EXPOSURE FROM PENDING LAWSUITS
Fitch notes that the risk inherent in revenue raising
restrictions may well be amplified were the district to receive unfavorable
rulings in on-going lawsuits regarding water quality and condemnation
procedures. The district cannot quantify its potential financial exposure.
PLANNED
USE OF RESERVES
The district has developed a five-year plan to spend down
about $350 million in fund balance accumulated in all funds. The district will
reduce the anticipated $146 million total operational fund balance by
approximately $23.8 million in fiscal 2012 and nearly $12 million in fiscal
2013 in an effort to prop up recurring expenses while the district attempts to
obtain less onerous monitoring requirements. Fitch is cautious concerning the
district's ability to achieve the proposed changes, but notes that even so,
strong fiscal management could allow the district to return to structural
balance.
The remainder of the accumulated fund balance will
primarily finance capital projects. Although a significant portion of the
reserves are booked in capital funds and had largely been designated for
subsequent years' capital expenditures, these reserves had traditionally
provided a considerable source of near-term flexibility.
At the end of fiscal 2010, the $158.5 million unreserved
fund balance in the two primary operating funds, the general fund and the
Okeechobee Basin fund (OBF), equaled an ample 40.4% of spending. An additional
$203.7 million in unreserved fund balance was available in the CERP fund, a
capital projects fund which receives transfers from the general fund and OBF to
carry out the pay-go portion of the district's CERP program. Preliminary fiscal
2011 results indicate that total fund balance in the two operational funds will
decline by $30 million. The total fund balance in the CERP fund will decrease
by $155 million, as the fund was the primary source for a $194 million cash
purchase of land from U.S. Sugar, in lieu of a previously planned debt
issuance. The district anticipates that by fiscal 2016 reserve levels will be
$54 million for general needs and emergencies, which coupled with a $10 million
capital reserve would equal around 19.6% of fiscal 2012 revenues.
STRONG ECONOMY WEAKENED BY HOUSING DETERIORATION
The district covers all or parts of 16 south and central
Taxable assessed value (TAV) has declined around 29% since
fiscal 2008 to $665 billion in fiscal 2010. The district expects mild tax base
decline of 3.8% in fiscal 2013. Further tax base deterioration, if not severe,
will not necessarily translate into a major credit concern due to the state's
control over the tax levy. The combined population of the district's service
area increased over 16% since 2000 to nearly 7.7 million people in 2010. The
ability to grow population over the near term will be challenged by the area's
high unemployment rate and lowered property values.
MODERATELY LOW DEBT BURDEN
Debt ratios remain moderately low at $2,241 per capita and
2.6% of AV reflecting the district's substantial tax base and population. The
district has suspended all future debt plans. It will fund its restoration
projects through fiscal 2016 by utilizing reserves and state revenues and its
capital operating and maintenance projects from recurring ad valorem revenues. Fitch does not anticipate that
subsequently there will be sufficient ad valorem
revenues to maintain the historically high level of pay-as-you-go capital
financing. Pension and OPEB requirements do not pressure the credit.
COPs: INCENTIVE TO APPROPRIATE
The master lease structure provides appropriation
incentive for the district because non-appropriation would force the district
to surrender all leased assets to the trustee. Leased assets include lands
beneath Compartments B and C (storm water treatment areas). Further, if as a
result of a default or non-appropriation the trustee does not use the
facilities sites for purposes consistent with the restoration of the
Everglades, the district would be required to provide replacement land of at
least equal fair market value pursuant to certain land grant agreements with
the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI).
SPECIAL
OBLIGATION BONDS: HISTORICAL RATE AND DISTRIBUTION ALTERATIONS
Pledged documentary stamp tax revenues are collected by
the Florida Department of Revenue (DOR) and distributed pursuant to state law.
The first 7% collected is distributed to the state's general fund; DOR then
deducts administrative costs. The Florida Department of Environmental
Protection (FDEP) trust fund receives 4.2% of the remaining revenue for the
benefit of the state's five water management districts, of which SFWMD's share is 30%. FDEP is required in each year to set
aside and escrow from the first money available from the trust fund an amount
sufficient to meet debt service.
The rating reflects credit risk associated with the
legislature's ability and past history of altering the tax rates and
distribution formulas. The legislature has imposed a $60.5 million cap on the
distribution of documentary stamp tax revenue to the trust fund, effectively
limiting the district's allotment to $18.15 million and more recently diverted
$3 million that would otherwise be available to the district for pay-as-you-go
capital financing. While there exists an implied
contract with the state to allocate sufficient documentary stamp revenues to
cover debt service, any additional legislative action that creates uncertainty
as to the availability of sufficient resources to pay bondholders would place
downward pressure on the rating.
Documentary stamp tax revenues stabilized in fiscal 2010
and provided MADS coverage of 2.0 times (x), an increase from the 1.6x of
fiscal 2009 but well below the high 5.8x at the peak of the housing market.
Interest and penalty distributions were minimal, raising MADS coverage to 2.1x. Documentary stamp tax distributions to the district
could decline by as much as 49.7% and still cover MADS by at least 1.0x. The Florida
Legislature's Office of Economic & Demographic Research estimates continued
documentary stamp tax growth through bond maturity in 2015, which Fitch
believes reduces the possibility of a diminishment of the distribution cap.
Bondholders receive additional protection from the state law that effectively
prohibits the issuance of additional new money bonds.
Additional information is available at '
www.fitchratings.com '. The ratings above were
solicited by, or on behalf of, the issuer, and therefore, Fitch has been
compensated for the provision of the ratings.
In addition to the sources of information identified in
Fitch's Tax-Supported Rating Criteria, this action was additionally informed by
information from Creditscope, University Financial
Associates, S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index,
IHS Global Insight, Zillow.com, and the National Association of Realtors.
Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
--'Tax-Supported Rating Criteria' (
--'
Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
Tax-Supported Rating Criteria
http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=648898
http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=648842
ALL FITCH
CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ
THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS.
IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE
AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEBSITE ' WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM '. PUBLISHED
RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES.
FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE
FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO
AVAILABLE FROM THE 'CODE OF CONDUCT' SECTION OF THIS SITE.
SOURCE:
Fitch Ratings
Fitch
Ratings
Primary
Analyst
Barbara
Ruth Rosenberg, +1-212-908-0731
Director
Fitch,
Inc.
or
Secondary
Analyst
Michael Rinaldi, +1-212-908-0833
Senior
Director
or
Committee
Chairperson
Amy Laskey, +1-212-908-0568
Managing
Director
or
Media
Relations:
Sandro Scenga, +1-212-908-0278
Email: sandro.scenga@fitchratings.com
Copyright
Business Wire 2012